America on Immigration- are we really fixing this problem?

Immigration is not a subject that I have ever had an articulate opinion on. I took some time today to think about it, and after reading Silko's piece, I feel like I have a better idea. It was shocking to me that Border Patrol officers have the legal clearance to pull over absolutley anyone they want to at the checkpoint, including "white people who appear to be clergy, those who wear ethnic clothing or jewelry, and women with very long hair or very short hair." It seems wrong to me that the patrolmen are allowed to search anyone who comes through even if they don't have any reasonable suspicion. Silko is an American citizen, but since she is of color, she got pulled over and searched by the patrolmen; even legitimate citizenship doesn't count for anything in the minds of the patrolmen.

There must be another way to keep illegal immigrants from coming into the country. Better yet, there needs to be a way to help people in the citizenship process. Frankly, however, I don't think the opportunities for most immigrants are as great as they anticipate. A friend of mine went to law school in Mexico and came here to hellp support her family. Most of her family lives here, but she sends money to Mexico every month to support her parents. She works as a cleaning lady, but she is obviously more qualified and intelligent than her position. I think the opportunities for her to work as a lawyer in Ecuador are far superior to any opportunity she has hear. Most immigrants take positions here that no Americans will take: the grunt work. For many of them, there are better opportunities for them in other parts of the world, but they have been lured here by the promise of the American Dream.

Journal #14- Response to Britnee Rosales

While I do agree that it would be a necessity for me to carry something with me from home, like a photograph or a letter, I disagree with your opinion that it helped Lieutenant Cross to carry those items that reminded him of Martha. I actually believe it was detrimental to his platoon that he was constantly focused on what he had left at home. He would get so enveloped in thinking about the relationship he wanted with Martha that he didn't focus fully on leading his platoon.

After he burned the photographs and letters from Martha, he shows that he wants to turn all of his attention to the platoon because he feels resposible for what happened to Ted Lavender: "It wouldn't help Lavender, he knew that, but from this point on he would comport himself as an officer" (1471). Cross felt that some of the emotional baggage he carried ditracted from his ability to carry out his duty as the leader of the platoon. This gave me the idea that it would be nice to have something to remind me of what I was fighting for, but I wouldn't want to carry anything that would keep me from effectively serving.

Bonus Blog #3- Double-consciousness

The most apparent illustration of double-consciousness in the texts by Sui Sin Far and Onoto Watanna were shown in the language of the characters in both stories. Both authors use dialogue to show the obvious difference between natural-born Americans and immigrants. In Sui Sin Far's story, Lae Choo and her husband use broken English, often omitting words from their sentences. This is shown on page 303 of the text when Lae Choo says to the lawyer, "What that you say?" This is an interesting juxtaposition of the characters because the educated lawyer and the Chinese immigrant mother have a conversation where their language is a clear difference between them.
The same is true in Watanna's story when Okikusan speaks to her father. Watanna has done a great job of writing the language exactly as it would be spoken. The Japanese accent is very audible throughout the story, and it is furhter emphasized because Okikusan speaks this broken English while she is in her own country. It shows ho great the American influence on Asia really was becuase people, even in Asia, see American people and speak to them in whatever English they know.
Both of the characters, Lae Choo and Okikusan, are accutely aware of their differences from Americans, and they both have this double-consciousness and awareness of themselves as they attempt to belong to one culture. They both hear their differences in the way they speak English, and they both see them in the way they look. Okikusan's circumstance is a little different however because she has the brown, curly hair of an American woman and the facial characteristics of a Japanese woman.

Zitkala-Sa and the American Dream

Zitkala-Sa'a story is, in my opinion, an attempt at fulfilling the American Dream. After she receives a prize from her second speech competition, at the end of the story, she says, "the little taste of victory did not satisfy a hunger in my heart" (438). She attempts to climb up in society, and she wants to achieve her goals in life, but at this time in American history, there is no way for her to truly fulfill her goals. She gets a "little taste of victory" when she wins the competition, but there is still so much animosity toward Native Americans. The spectators at the competition are a perfect example of this; one of them holds a flag with a racial slur against Native Americans and displays the extreme prejudice she faces throughout her life.
Even if she was able to achieve her American Dream, there would be one party that was against her. Her Native American mother did not support her decision to pursue her education at the university. The general population of her origin does not support her assimilation into "white" culture, and it takes time for her to embrace both her native history and her new culture.

A Surviving Quality of Hawai'ian Culture

"His people welcomed our presence; and no matter how protracted our stay, Hawaiian hospitality, or love and loyalty, whichever it may please the reader to call it, was never exhausted." Chapter IV

One of the reasons I like this quote is because it talks about how Hawaiian, not American, hospitality survived through American Imperialism; it shows a sense of pride in Hawaiian culture. When it says that hospitality "was never exhausted," it shows that people had to work hard to keep their culture alve through American Imperialism.

11- Response to Shelby Turner

It was really interesting that you brought up the way McKay called White people "hungry dogs" and "the monsters." I noticed this, too, and was shocked by how openly Black authors were beginning to write and speak their minds. The way these two authors wrote really shows how the tables turned in American culture. Before and during the Civil War, the countr was owned, controlled and dominated by White people. But when the war ended, more Black people were able to speak out in support of their race. Some, like McKay and Hopkins, went as far as to seek revenge from White people in their writing. With their new sense of power and freedom of speech after the war, Black people as well as White abolitionists were able to show their disapproval of slavery and discrimination in new ways.
Hopkins' story showed that, even though Black people could not be legally bound to White people anymore, there was still a lot that kept them inferior. Lynching was unforgiving. If someone even pointed a the finger of blame at a Black person, they were sure to be hunted down, even if they had truthfully done nothing wrong. Black people also still worked for White people. Since most of the money in the country belonged to White male landowners, like Reverend Stevens, Black people acquired jobs from them to earn money of their own.

Realizations about Slavery 10/24

When reading The Wife of his Youth, the moment I realized that Mr. Ryder was Liza's husband was when he stood up in the middle of his dinner party and told the story of his afternoon visitor. But I didn't know what he would do with that information until the last paragraph of the story. That is the point in the story when I learned something new about slavery; it was never too late for any of them. By the time Liza was freed, Mr. Ryder (Sam) had already begun his new life, but she didn't stop looking for him. She never gave up in the hopes that she could finally begin her life with him. In the Harper poem, in the last two stanzas, we find out that the speaker is sixty years old. When I first read the poem, the way it talked about beginning an education, I thought the speaker was much younger. It reminded me that, when the Civil War ended, African Americans of all ages were freed, and some of them were finally able to start their lives as free people when they were already in their later years.

Another point in the story that stood out to me was hen Mr. Ryder says, "we people of mixed blood are ground between the upper and the nether millstone. Our fate lies between absorption by the white race and extinction in the black" (57). It showed that there was a heirarchy in society after the Civil War. It wasn't a utopia of free citizens. White people were still at the top, Black people were still at the bottom, and mulattos were not accepted by either group. In other words, mulattos were too white to be considered black and too black to be considered white. In this story they had their own separate society and it may have been frowned upon for Mr. Ryder to acknowledge Liza as his wife because she was a black woman born into slavery and she did not fit into their mulatto society.

The Contemporary Connection 10/20/11

There have been events in American history that play large roles in defining our nation. Most often, the reason these events define us is because of how people decided to progress afterward. The Civil War is one of those events. It changed so many lives and people in our country, and it cut our nation in half. Another one of these events was 9/11. On page 2 of the introduction, it says, "the gulf between life before and after the war continued to expand during the following decades." Life changed for people after the Civil War, and all of our lives changed after 9/11. I was not directly affected by this event, but I do remember that it was the last time I truly felt safe.
In our country today, there is a deepening split between Middle Eastern Americans and all other Americans. It's out of fear that people have begun to discriminate against Middle Eastern Americans, and it's because no one wants to see such a devastating event take place again. It must be a lot like the aftermath of the Civil War. No one knew quite what was going to happen, so they tried to go through their lives walking on eggshells so as not to cause such a great war again.
As they began healing from the Civil War, they ran into some issues that still exist in our nation today; immigration is still a problem in our country. America has been called a beacon of hope to the refugees of other nations, but even in over 100 years, the system is still majorly flawed. Is it really such a beacon of hope and promise if the people who come here have no promise of being able to stay? Americans in the 1880's struggled with an influx in immigrants, especially those from China. Many of the Chinese who immigrated worked on the transcontinental railroad, taking the physical labor jobs that other Americans didn't want. In our country today, this still happens. It's not Chinese men building the railroad, butsometimes it is stereotypically Mexican men and women doing yard work and cleaning houses. There is still a stereotype of the people who immigrate to our country, and they come here to try to achieve their dreams which become part of the American Dream. Wouldn't that make these people American through their ideals?

Journal #8 Response to Denzel Green

You brought up a lot of interesting points about using religion as a way that writers used to connect to audiences in the North and the South. To go off of what you mentioned in your post, I noticed that religion was also a common theme in Lincoln's second inaugural address. When says, "both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes His aid against the other," I think he levels the playing field between Northerners and Southerners. He shows that, although the two regions differ in their opinions of separation, there are a lot of beliefs they share. They hold the same religious beliefs and many of the same American values. The Civil War, in this way, was truly a war between brothers. They all lived in the same nation, but had beliefs about slavery and separation that drove them apart.
Religion is, and always has been, a strong symbol in America, and the fact that all three of these authors use different aspects of it shows that an argument based on religious interpretation is not a strong one in this context. Although I like how Lincoln brought up the common religious affiliations among Americans, I don't think that any author should base their whole pro- or anti-slavery argument on it. There is far too much room for interpretation on the subject, and people on both sides of the North-South border can use it to their advantage when talking about slavery.

Journal 7- Abolitionist Poetry

In Whittier's poem, The Farwell of a Virginia Slave Mother to her Daughters Sold into Southern Bondage, the most compelling element I saw was the use of sound. The rhyming pattern combined with the repetition of certain words made it a very memorable poem. The rhyming of each couplet in the poem could have made it easy for people to remember because each line foreshadows what will be said in the next line. Also, the number of syllables in each line gave it a rhythm that was carried throughout the poem. These two combined elements make it easier for people to remember the words of it once they've heard it, extending the poem's audience to the still prevalent illiterate population of America in the mid 1800's. The memorable quality of the poem also could have helped it reach another medium-- through song. The way the poem flows is very much like a song, which could have been another way for it to reach a greater audience.
A few lines that stood out to me were repeated throughout the writing: "Gone, gone- sold and gone/ To the rice swamp dank and lone./ From virginia's hills and waters;/ Woe is me, my stolen daughters!" This refrain appears, in its entirety, six times in the poem; and to me, this repetition gave the readers and listeners a chance to interpret the feelings with which the author wrote them. If someone read this poem out loud, the sound of these lines would change each of the six times it was said. I felt more emotional attachment to the lines each time I read them, and they really stuck in my mind. As the emotion builds throughout this poem, so does the reader's longing to be able to do something about it. This is the way Whittier calls his readers to action. By utilizing tools of sound to tell the reader that something needs to be done to end the system of slavery.

Journal 6

One of the elements in the last two readings changed the way I think of the history of American slavery. Since the first time I took a history class in school, I have been taught and told about the tragedies of slavery and how it affected (and still affects) African Americans in our country. However, I have never thought about the way it affected White people in our country. These readings opened my eyes to much of the suffering of female slaves, but in this entry, I want to discuss the way it opened my eyes to the White Americans who were caught between two cultures.
In Jacobs' piece, One of the characters who fits the role of a person struggling between Blacks and Whites is Mrs. Bruce. She is a character who supported the efforts of African American slaves, and she was the one who eventually freed Jacobs. On page 791, when she says, "I should, at least, have the satisfaction of knowing that you left me a free woman," it shows that she was more than just Jacobs' slaveholder. She was her friend. She saw Jacobs and her children as people, not just as pieces of property. At a time in American history when so many wealthy White people depended on slaves to carry out their hard work, Mrs. Bruce was one of the people who went against the beliefs of many of her fellow White Americans and did what she thought was right. From this, I also assume that she fought for more than one cause at the time.
In "The Quadroons," Edward is the character who was conflicted by the cultural and ethnic gap between him, his true love and his daughter. Edward, unlike Mrs. Bruce, wasn't strong enough to break down that barrier. Even after he realized his mistake when Rosalie died, he didn't bring his daughter to his level in society. He tried to make her life more comfortable, but in the end his regrets for not staying with Rosalie got the better of him.

Journal 5- Common Themes

One of the common themes in our past few readings has been the idea of using writing as a portal for societal reform. We saw this in Phelps' short story, "The Tenth of January," and we see it again in the writings of Apess and Sigourney. In the last two readings, we see specifically a theme of reform for the treatment of Native Americans. When I began reading William Apess' "An Indian's Looking-glass for the White Man," I saw Apess as an assimilated Native American who had abandoned his culture. He used Christian ideals in his piece, and he spoke ill of the culture from which he came. He said that one reason they were uncivilized was because "they have no education" (Belasco 641). At first, I took this as a bash on the Native American lifestyle, but when I looked closer and thought about his life a little more, I realized that his overall mission in saying this was to advocate for assimilation. He was able to address the White Men of the time because he was a product of their society, not his Native American one. He was educated and was converted to Christianity, giving opportunities that he would not have had if not for his adaptation to the white culture. He seems caught between two worlds in his writing; he wants to take steps to bring his fellow Native Americans out of the lack of civilization he sees in their society, but he still wants to be accepted by white men.
Lydia Sigourney, however, was on the other side of the river fighting for better treatment of Native Americans. Like Apess, she wanted Native Americans to be treated humanely, but unlike him she didn't want them to be treated as equals to the white men. She didn't want them to lose their culture or their territory or be forced to assimilate to the white man's culture. Her poem, "Indian Names," shows that she sees a never-ending presence of Native American culture in America; all of the places she names in the poem were named by the Native Americans, and many of the names have withstood the test of time. It is also evident in her poem that she blames the presence of white people for the poor treatment of Native Americans when she says, "Your mountains build their monument, Though ye destroy their dust" (1205). In a way, she is saying that Native Americans held onto this land we live in for so long, but now white people came in and tried to erase the Native Americans completely. She sees the error in this, but she also sees that their contributions to America (even before it was called America) will never be completely forgotten.
Just from these two readings, we can see that many different people fought for better treatment of Native Americans. However, there was not a united effort, nor was there a common concept of what "better" treatment was. Should they be forced to assimilate? Or, would it be better to leave them alone and give them back their land?

Journal 4- "The Tenth of February"

In Elizabeth Phelps' story, "The Tenth of February," there are several symbols that represent the idea of imprisonment. The female characters in the story all, at one point or another, seem imprisoned by something. For Asenath, the symbol of imprisonment throughout the story is her disability. During this time period, it seems like marriage is a very important goal of life, especially for women; and Asenath's deformity keeps her from living a normal life and finding love. At one point, her pretty friend Del says, "'Who do you suppose would ever marry you?'" Asenath throughout her life is kept from believing that she could ever find love and marriage. Because of this, she mentions over and over throughout the story that she sees death as a way out. Asenath was not blessed with the good looks of her friends, and she sees no real way to be happy in life without achieving this goal of getting married.
For Del, the imprisoned feeling comes from having to work in the factory. Unlike Asenath, it seems like Del sees marriage not as something to strive and work for, but as something to wait for. After all, with her appearance, in the society she lives in, it would only be a matter of time before she was married off and could stop working. Throughout the story, it seems that both girls think of marriage as something that must happen in order for their lives to be complete. It shows the importance of marriage during this time period as a woman's way out of the work force. And it seems like many women wanted to get out of the work force because all of the work available to them was manual labor in factories.

Journal 3 (Question 1)

In Irving's short story, I was upset a little bit by the way he talks about women in the beginning. His writing suggested that marriage really wasn't about the woman, but that its purpose was so that a man could have someone to comfort him. I think that is still a very important part of marriage today, but there is so much more to it. When I think of a marriage, I think of a partnership, but this piece of writing especially hwne they talk about money, shows that marriage was almost completely about the man. When Irving said that Leslie didn't want to break the news about their economic situation to Mary, he said that he didn't want to "overwhelm her with the news" (527). It was like he thought she couldn't handle hearing about the trials of the real world; like she was so fragile that it would ruin her spirit.
The other part of the story that made me question it was when Leslie was talking about how he wanted to spoil Mary with gifts and make her life into a fairytale. At first, I really didn't see any love in the story; it seemed more like the adoring husband put his wife on a pedastal. He felt like she was too helpless to get what she wanted on her own, and maybe she was at that time because women socially didn't stand a chance in the work force.
However, in the end of the story, when Mary welcomes her new lifestyle with open arms, I really felt the love between her and her husband. At first, I thought marriage in this time period was shallow, but the end of the story showed that marriage was pretty similar to what it is now. There was real love in marriage that kept people together, and the wives played a very important role supporting their husbands so that they could accomplish what they did at the time.

Journal 2- Bedford p. 311-33

Today's reading showed me something about the beginning of the United States that I had never thought of before. I've taken quite a few classes on American history, and I'm glad to have had the opportunity to learn about our country as much as I have; but today's reading put things in a new perspective. I knew that one of the things that brought the American colonies together was the oppression they felt from Great Britain, but I never thought about how influencial language was to the banding together of so many cultures. The textbook talks about how many different cultures and religions were present in the New World-- there were Dutch, Germans, English, Protestants, Catholics, Puritans, Native Americans-- and they all had different sets of values to live by. They all had separate newspapers and ways of communicating through the written word. However, once the British began taxing them outrageously for the products essential to spreading information, they realized that the overarching goal they all had was the same. They wanted to be free from the constraints and exploitation of Britain.
It amazed me that language was so important to them that so many people put their beliefs, their cultures, and their pride in the back seat and decided that the lines of communication should be open among all of the colonies. When they realized that their routes of communication were at the threat of being cut off because of a ridiculous tax, many of them decided that there were more important things to worry about than fighting among the diverse groups of people who came here. They all came here for a reason and they all were tired of being exploited and controlled by the British. And the power and the need for the written word is one fo the things that brought them together to fight for the nation that we still fight for today.

Journal 1- What is an American?

Before I walked into class on Tuesday, I had been trying to think about my definition of "America." Since I have been incredibly fortunat all my life to attend great school and live in nice, safe places, I think of America in a very positive light. However, when we discussed Crevecoeur's letter, I started thinking that maybe I made the same mistake he did. His biggest mistake in writing about America was that he wrote about it solely from his point of view and the views of people lke him. He excluded some of the large populations of America at the time, like the Native Americans, women, slaves, Jews and Eastern Europeans. I realized that I was not looking at America as a whole, I was only looking at it from the perspective of people who have been as fortunate as I have been.
As we were reading the Langston Hughes poems, I realized that my view of America completely neglected the victims of racism that still exists here. Although Hughes wrote his poems more than fifty years ago, there is still a problem with racism in our country. I still think America is a wonderful country filled with freedom and opportunity, but Hughes' poems have reminded me that America still has a long way to go to become the utopia it was orginially intended to be.